How I Would Fix Canada’s Democracy

So after I wrote that post yesterday, I got to thinking about what sorts of specific democratic reforms I would actually like to see implemented. I surprised myself with just how non-radical most of them actually are, for things which haven’t a snowball’s chance of actually being done. Here’s the list:

  1. Implement a system of run-off votes for Parliamentary seats, as they do in France: Right now, Canada has what is known as a First-Past-the-Post electoral system; in order to win a seat in parliament, you only need to win a plurality of the votes in your riding. As there can be as many as three or four major parties contesting a riding, it is entirely possible, and indeed common, for candidates to “win” with as little as thirty percent of the actual vote. Which means that someone can be virulently hated by 70% of their constituents but if they split their vote,that person will still end up being their representative. Clearly, this is an enormous problem. By forcing a system of run-offs, no candidate can ever be declared a victor until they attain more than 50% support.
  2. Abolish the Senate: Canada has two houses of parliament; the first is the House of Commons, which is elected (however imperfectly) by the people. The second is the Senate, whose members are appointed for life by the Prime Minister. Some people claim that the senate fulfills vital functions; I can’t help but notice, though, that all of the provincial government long ago disbanded their upper chambres without any problems whatsoever. Scrap it.
  3. Automatic Byelections: Right now, when a sitting MP retires or dies, the Prime Minister is given discretion to call a byelection in the vacant riding at any time during the next six months. Needless to say, he almost always tries to time this to his own advantage. I think that when an MP retires or dies, a byelections should automatically be called for approximately two months after the event. I also think that when an MP “crosses the floor” (i.e, goes to sit as a member of a party different from the one as which he was elected), he should be forced to stand in an automatic byelection. Same for any MP found to be in contravention of electoral laws.
  4. Change the Rules for Prorogation: Right now, the Prime Minister has the power to ask the Governor General to suspend parliament whenever he feels like it (and the GG has no choice but to acquiesce). I think it should take a two-thirds majority to prorogue the house.
  5. Change the Rules for Closure: Right now, a simple majority of MPs is all that is needed to suspend any debate in the house of commons; thus when there is a majority government (as there is right now), the Prime Minister can effectively order his MPs to silence dissenting voices from the opposition. I think this should require a two-thirds majority.
  6. Recall Referendums: If enough constituents in a riding demand a recall, a referendum should be called automatically; thus MPs will be responsive to their constituents, rather than just their party leaders.
  7. Mandatory Voting: Anyone over the age of majority should vote. It works in Australia without any problems.
  8. Compulsory Civics Classes in All Canadian High Schools: I should hope that this one is rather self-explanatory.

Looking back on this list, I can’t help but notice how similar these proposals are to alot of the ones made by the old Reform Party–the one in which Stephen Harper got his start, in fact. Now there’s a nice bit of historical irony for you.


About thevenerablecorvex

I have the heart of a poet, the brain of a theoretical physicist, and the wingspan of an albatross. I am also notable for my humility.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to How I Would Fix Canada’s Democracy

  1. turnthrice says:

    You have some great points! I, too, am a Canadian concerned about our politics, particularly the nature of Question and Answer periods held at the House of Commons. My first time watching a live Q&A was disappointing; never had I seen a group of grown men and women argue like children with such structure. I’d like to see how mandatory voting would be received by Canadians.

    • “My first time watching a live Q&A was disappointing; never had I seen a group of grown men and women argue like children with such structure.”

      What’s interesting is that if you look at the British HoC, their question time is alot more civilized. I’m not sure what they’re doing differently there, but we should do it over here.

      “I’d like to see how mandatory voting would be received by Canadians.”

      I’m sure they would grumble and then do it anyways. That seems to be the Canadian way.

      • turnthrice says:

        Britich HoC? I need to check that out… and yes, we would grumble quite a bit. Perhaps that’s the way of anyone who is told to do something versus having the choice to do it.

  2. n8chz says:

    Mandatory voting seems harsh. Hopefully there will at least be some kind of “conscientious objector” provision.

  3. Pingback: The Critical Need for Democratic Reform | voxcorvegis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s